PETA Campaigns Against Humans Using Animal Insults
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) love stirring up controversy. Recently, the activist group took to Twitter to campaign against humans using animal insults because they “degrade animals by applying negative human traits to certain species.” The organization called this use of language “speciesist” and “supremacist.” Furthermore, PETA listed some alternative words people should use, for instance, “lazy” instead of “sloth.”
Words can create a more inclusive world, or perpetuate oppression.
Calling someone an animal as an insult reinforces the myth that humans are superior to other animals & justified in violating them.
Stand up for justice by rejecting supremacist language. pic.twitter.com/HFmMWDcc5A
— PETA (@peta) January 26, 2021
In the English language, there’s an impressive number of ways to pejoratively label someone. Insulting and mocking people purely because we disagree with or fail to understand them shouldn’t be the norm. It’s deeply offensive and it makes no sense, so why do it at all?
PETA Pleas Against Humans Using Animal Insults
PETA’s plea to stop comparing humans to animals in an derogatory manner, however, sparked a huge reaction. Some netizens thought their suggestion was ridiculous to the point of being hilarious. Others weren’t sure if this was a joke or not.
“Animals aren’t oppressed by those words because they don’t understand our language,” a user wrote in a popular reply. “Animals have no concept of words and their meaning,” she continued.
“6 years vegan, please stop making us look ridiculous,” wrote a woman, in a tweet that received more than 7k likes.
“We still have a major problem with racism and you’re worried if animals are offended by being used as an insult?” another user wrote.
According to PETA, when we use an animal epithet to refer to a person or behavior, we degrade the animal by applying negative human traits to it. Consequently, we are supposedly contributing to the idea that certain animals are ugly, dirty, or lazy, thus normalizing violence against them.
Animal stereotypes date back to ancient Greece and ancient Rome. Accordingly, the so-called zoometaphors have been a part of our language ever since. Moreover, the connotation of the word is based on the animal itself. Our ancestors observed animals’ behavior and formed judgments based on the information they had at the time. While the traits attributed to animals can be outdated or inaccurate, they are hyperboles.
What do you think about PETA’s campaign? If we collectively stop calling a silly person a goose, will we impact the animal’s image or its impact on our ecosystem? Please share your thoughts in the comments section below.
Itís difficult to find knowledgeable people for this topic, however, you seem like you know what youíre talking about! Thanks
There is certainly a great deal to know about this topic. I really like all of the points you made.
Please tell me more about this
Thank you, I’ve recently been looking for info about this subject for a while and yours is the greatest I’ve discovered so far. But, what about the bottom line? Are you certain about the source?
I was able to find good advice from your blog posts.
In line with my study, after a foreclosed home is marketed at a sale, it is common for your borrower in order to still have a remaining balance on the bank loan. There are many creditors who aim to have all expenses and liens paid off by the following buyer. On the other hand, depending on specific programs, polices, and state guidelines there may be many loans which aren’t easily resolved through the transfer of lending products. Therefore, the obligation still rests on the debtor that has received his or her property in foreclosure process. Thank you sharing your notions on this blog.
Thanks for posting. I really enjoyed reading it, especially because it addressed my problem. It helped me a lot and I hope it will help others too.
Please tell me more about your excellent articles